conclusion as it had previously

The goverment sought Supreme Court review of the Fifth Circuit’s decision, and the Court sent the Daniels case back to the circuit court to reconsider its ruling in light of Rahimi. On remand, the Fifth Circuit reached the same conclusion as it had previously. It first determined that its analysis of § 922(g)(3) was largely controlled by its post-Rahimi circuit precedent, United States v. Connelly. The defendant in Connellyadmitted that she “would at times smoke marijuana as a sleep aid and for anxiety.” The circuit court agreed that support existed for laws restricting the possession of firearms by those who are actively intoxicated, but the court asserted that “there is a substantial difference between an actively intoxicated person and an ‘unlawful user’ สล็อต เว็บตรง